Peer reviewing an essay

For further information see our handout on How to Proofread. Before you read and while you read the paper Find out what the writer is intending to do in the paper purpose and what the intended audience is.

Peer reviewing an essay

Share via Email Reviewing is a good way to keep up with literature and sharpen your own writing, says Brian Lucey. You, putative reviewer, are the peer.

This is a core part of your job as an academic. It shows both that you are part of the academy and willing to engage in the interplay that makes the profession work. Reviewing is an excellent way to keep up with literature and a superb way to sharpen your own writing. Rejection should be a positive experience for all.

When you receive an email inviting you to review a paper, most journals will provide a link to either accept and or reject. It may also give you specific instructions, so follow these.

Suggest to the authors how to overcome the shortcomings you identify. It is usually much harder to suggest how to fix them. A review is more than a suggestion to revise, reject or accept. It should be meaningful. It should guide the author on what is good and what is not so good as you see it.

Explain what is going on in your thinking. Your role is that of a scientific peer. It is not that of an editor in either the proofreading or decision-making sense. If the paper is rife with errors, tell the editor and give examples.

Concentrate rather on showing the added value of your scientific knowledge and not so much on missing commas etc. If as part of your revision you think that the paper should be professionally proof edited as I sometimes do with my ownthen say so. A caveat to this is that the paper and indeed the review is an act of communication.

If it is so poorly constructed as to fail in its communication role, then tell me that. Remember that in the end the paper is not about style but substance, unless the style gets in the way. When you agree to review a paper with a timeline given unless there is a really good reasonyou should stick to it.

Believe it or not, editors do track who is reviewing what and when. We have to balance the natural tendency to give more reviews to those who do most, with a realisation that people are doing this essentially pro bono and have limited time.

So the timeframe we give is designed to be timely but mildly pressurising. Be realistic about the work presented, changes you suggest and your role.

You as a reviewer are part of the process. I, as editor, have that. Sometimes editors override the suggestions of reviewers hopefully with good reasons.If an essay commits a logical fallacy, it is yours to judge whether that fallacy only weakens the argument in a minor way, or catastrophically.

You should assign a score accordingly and explain your judgment on the peer review form. Conducting Peer Reviews. For further information see our handout on How to Proofread. Before you read and while you read the paper.

Find out what the writer is intending to do in the paper (purpose) and what the intended audience is. Find out what the writer wants from a reader at this stage.

The purpose of peer review as a prelude to revision is to help the writer determine which parts of the paper are effective as is, and which are unclear, incomplete, or unconvincing. 3.

Peer reviewing an essay

Describe peer review as an opportunity for students to . My Dashboard; Pages; Sample Essay 1 Peer Review Response & Grading Expectations; Fall Home; Modules; Syllabus; Quizzes; Assignments; Library; Academic Success.

[BINGSNIPMIX-3

November 21, Peer reviewing essays on success. Writing literary analysis essay powerpoint. An inspector calls essay sheila walsh An inspector calls essay sheila walsh ways to end persuasive essay heart of darkness critical review essay assisi poem critical essay college essay on overcoming failure an inspector calls essay sheila walsh gold cross speech essay shakespearean theatre essay.

Conducting Peer Reviews. For further information see our handout on How to Proofread.

Reviewing is a good way to keep up with literature and sharpen your own writing, says Brian Lucey. Photograph: Ian Waldie/Getty Images 1) Be professional. It's called peer review for a reason. You. The purpose of peer review as a prelude to revision is to help the writer determine which parts of the paper are effective as is, and which are unclear, incomplete, or unconvincing. 3. Describe peer review as an opportunity for students to . The purpose of peer review as a prelude to revision is to help the writer determine which parts of the paper are effective as is, and which are unclear, incomplete, or unconvincing. 3. Describe peer review as an opportunity for students to learn how to write for an audience.

Before you read and while you read the paper. Find out what the writer is intending to do in the paper (purpose) and what the intended audience is. Find out what the writer wants from a reader at this stage.

Revision: Conducting Peer Reviews