Students writing in a second language are also faced with social and cognitive challenges related to second language acquisition. L1 models of writing instruction and research on composing processes have been the theoretical basis for using the process approach in L2 writing pedagogy.
Negotiation I played Chris Rudolph in this case, and did well in this negotiation by not only focusing on the final price, but also on the extra agreement of letting Lama provided high quality work to our company.
This increased my expected level of payment a lot. Thus I was in a very passive position that I felt every argument I made was asking him for a favor to give me a discount. Then I started to think what mistake I did during this case. I believed that my major mistake was that I changed my mind too easily.
Also, I learned from this case that I could be more aggressive in the negotiation.
Most of my friend told me that I am a very friendly people with mild personality, and I really hate to have conflict with other people. New Recruit I did well by asking my negotiation partner as well as myself to organize Reflective journal on negotiation essay 8 issues into 3 categories: My initial plan was that for those issues that my partner care most, and I care least, we can go extreme, say let my partner get all the points and vice vesa.
By doing this, we quickly got consensus on most of the issues and figured out there were some issues we had the same goal. I knew that the salary was the major conflict issue between us. But my partner just came up with several points that why my company should pay him higher, he mentioned that he had several other offers at hand and most importantly, he believed that his skill set was quite qualify with our job, he listed his strengths, how good team player he is, etc.
So he deserved a higher pay. After the case debrief, I realized that all the arguments that my partner used to argue for a higher pay were not come from the case materials, he basically made up all these information by himself. It is not necessary to ask yourself to make up some fake data, but most important, how can you convince others use your logical and powerful argument.
At the same time, I also realized that the negotiation partners are not always having the conflict interests during the negotiation. In this case, for some of the issues, we actually have the same goals.
So baring this in mind, in the future negotiation case, I would first seek the common goals for both of us first to create a win-win situation. Com Our team approached this negotiation case in a very efficient way. Each of us had a very clearly job assignment.
Two people took care of the calculation while the other two people were responsible for the negotiation. Thus we quickly built up a model and provided several options to our counterparts with different terms but same net value of the final bargaining agreement to our team. At the same time, our counterparts were also doing the same thing.
Each one in their team had a dedicated assignment. And most importantly, they did quite well on setting the goal clearly at the beginning that they want to collaborate with us to create the biggest pie. Thus, by setting this tone, our negotiation situation was more like a team based collaboration work to find the best interest for both sides instead of negotiating and fighting for better interest for different sides.
However, I also had to admit that during this negotiation, our team made a unintended mistake by saying that we had a maximum run of 7 times instead of 8 runs. It is actually a miscommunication within our team because the people that delivered this message thought that we were allowed them to run under 8 times.
Thus when the rest teammates found his mistake, we did not know how to fix it. Overall, I like this team based negotiation experience very much. The key learning for me from this case is there are definitely many synergies when negotiate as a team.
And the internal communication and collaboration skills are quite important.
If I were in a real and serious negotiation situation, I believe the effort I would put within the team to align our negotiate strategy would be no less than the effort we put on our counterparts. At the same time, I learned that since I am not an aggressive people, it actually good for me to team with some one who is more demanding than me.
For example, our team first offered a price that I believe I would never offered if I negotiated alone. And because I was in a team at that time, I felt more confortable because you knew you have a whole team to support you.
Federated Science Fund I played the role of Turbo in this case, and before we started to negotiate, my original tactic was that I first allied with one of my counterparts, once we had the alliance, it can increase our barging power dramatically.A social networking service (also social networking site, or SNS or social media) is an online platform which people use to build social networks or social relations with other people who share similar personal or career interests, activities, backgrounds or real-life connections..
Social networking services vary in format and the number of features.
They can incorporate a range of new. The negotiation with the Island Queen Company progressed very well and achieved a good result. The fact that both parties were implementing an integrative collaborative strategy resulted in a very pleasant and beneficial negotiation for both parties.
Essay on Guidelines for Completing the Reflective Journal Templates. Guidelines for completing the Reflective Journal Templates Studies have shown that reflection upon one’s learning is key to a full learning experience.
Constructivism is a philosophical viewpoint about the nature of grupobittia.comically, it represents an ontological stance.. There are many flavors of constructivism, but one prominent theorist known for his constructivist views is Jean Piaget, who focused on how humans make meaning in relation to the interaction between their experiences and their ideas.
A. AGS Ethics Committee, Physician-Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Active Euthanasia. Journal of American Geriatrics Society, May , 43(5) Conflict assessment is the essential first stage in the process of conflict management and resolution.
A primary goal of such assessment is for all concerned parties to gain a deeper understanding of the dynamics inherent in their relationships.